Key takeaways

  • Carta and Pulley both offer cap table software, but they serve different founder and company needs. A detailed comparison across key dimensions follows.
  • Carta, a well recognised brand, has been the default solution. Its institutional scale appeals to later stage companies. But its also seen as rigid and inflexible and rapidly increases prices.
  • Pulley has been the challenger brand with an easier to use interface and lower pricing. While it's designed to cater to smaller companies, it surprising doesn't offer a free plan for really early-stage companies.
  • Qapita is an alternative worth considering since it offers the best of both worlds. Rated No 1 on G2, Qapita starts with a FREE plan for early stage founders and also offers flexibility with scale, is easier to use, offers better support and has pricing which is more affordable & transparent

Carta vs. Pulley in detail

Category Carta Pulley
Starting off A genuinely free way to get started, but there are two limits and one important catch.
  • Carta Launch is free if you have fewer than 25 stakeholders and have raised less than $1M. Both conditions matter, so a seed round can take you out of the free plan even if your team hasn't grown.
  • It's a real cap table product, not just a trial. You can manage SAFEs, track fundraising benchmarks, and handle electronic issuance.
  • 409A isn't included, so before you give out your first option grants you require a paid tier to get a 409A.
  • Documents and certificates are generated directly in Carta.
There's no free plan, which is probably the biggest reason a lot of pre-seed companies rule it out early.
  • Pricing starts at $1,200/year from your first stakeholder, which is unusual for a product aimed at early-stage founders.
  • In return, you get concierge onboarding with an equity specialist.
  • It's designed for founders managing equity themselves: guided issuance flows, step-by-step prompts, tips, and alerts. Spreadsheet mode is there for bulk work.
  • In practice, if a pre-seed team isn't willing to spend $1,200, they'll probably keep managing equity in a spreadsheet for another six months.
Features & functionality The broader platform, with more capabilities as you move up the tiers.

The free Launch tier covers the essentials: cap table management, SAFE financings, and fundraising benchmarks drawn from Carta's own dataset, which remains the strongest benchmark data in the category. Priced-round modelling and deal pro formas start at Build, board meetings and consents at Grow, and exit and waterfall modelling at Scale.

Issue an ISO, NSO, RSU, RSA, or SAR, get it signed, track vesting, and eventually process the exercise, without the record ever leaving the platform. Employees can see their own grants and model an exercise themselves, which takes most of the routine questions off your plate. 409A valuations and 83(b) support come in at the Grow tier.

It goes well beyond the cap table, with compensation benchmarking, QSBS attestation, liquidity, equity advisory, and fund administration. However, none of these are included in the core tiers. All five are sold separately on top of your plan. Total Compensation has also recently been unbundled from the equity plans entirely.

The breadth is real, but so is the tiering. Capabilities unlock as you move up the plans, which means the thing you need at a particular milestone can often sit behind the next tier. And at the higher tiers, you may end up paying for a bundle even if you only need one or two capabilities. The clearest example is reporting for your first audit: it sits at the top of the ladder. If you're on Build or Grow when your auditor asks for stock-based compensation reporting, you're having a conversation with a sales rep rather than simply turning on a setting.

A narrower equity product by design, but very good at the things founders actually spend time on.
  • Templated SAFE, option, and RSA agreements from the entry plan; custom agreements on Growth.
  • Strong dilution and fundraise modelling, including Excel pro forma exports for counsel, pre-money SAFE conversion, pro-rata, and YC participation support.
  • Interactive offer letters make equity easier for candidates to understand.
  • The only one of the two with meaningful token equity support: token cap tables, distributions, and valuations.
  • Less suited to phantom units, complex multi-entity structures, and heavier plan administration.
409A valuations Built into the paid tiers, but you need to be a Carta customer to get one.
  • Not included in Launch, so your first option grants require an upgrade.
  • Audit support is available at higher tiers.
  • Carta doesn't sell standalone valuations to non-customers, making the 409A another reason to stay on the platform rather than a standalone service.
  • The process is heavily automated, making it fast and consistent, but there are fewer touchpoints with a named specialist for methodology questions.
Included with the $3,500 Growth plan, and it makes that plan look pretty reasonable if you need a 409A anyway.
  • Five business day turnaround, with accelerated valuations available.
  • A dedicated 409A specialist rather than relying entirely on an automated process.
  • Audit support included.
  • A standalone 409A from an outside firm typically costs into the low thousands, so the valuation itself accounts for a meaningful part of the Growth plan fee.
Support Tiered support can create an awkward situation: the founder who needs the most help is often getting the least of it.
  • Paid plans get an implementation team and premier support.
  • Below that, the intended path is self-service through Carta Classroom, documentation, and the community forum.
  • That works as a deliberate model, but can be difficult for a first-time founder who doesn't yet know what questions to ask.
  • G2 criticism repeatedly points to delayed responsiveness, particularly around renewal.
One support tier for everyone, and arguably one of Pulley's smartest decisions.
  • Published average response time of under five minutes.
  • Support staff have founder and legal backgrounds rather than following a purely scripted model.
  • Support extends to stakeholders, counsel, and auditors, so your lawyer can ask Pulley directly instead of routing everything through you.
  • Support quality is one of the most consistent themes in Pulley's positive reviews.
Pricing Free at the very beginning, but much harder to predict once you move beyond that.
  • Launch: Free for companies with fewer than 25 stakeholders and under $1M raised.
  • Build, Grow, and Scale: No published pricing. Each requires a conversation with sales.

What companies actually pay is much less predictable. Vendr, which brokers software contracts, has handled 679 Carta deals. Across 405 of those, the median buyer paid $15,400/year, with actual spend ranging from $2,942 to $55,495. By stage, that works out to roughly $3,000–$8,000 for seed companies with fewer than 50 stakeholders, $10,000–$25,000 at Series A–C with 100–300 stakeholders, and $30,000–$75,000+ at later stages.

The bill is built from three moving parts: a platform fee based on your stage, per-stakeholder charges, and add-on modules. Vendr records overage charges of $20–$50 per additional stakeholder, onboarding and migration fees of $1,000–$5,000, and annual price increases of 5–10% written into contracts.

409A is another cost on top. It isn't included in the platform fee. Vendr puts the cost at $2,000–$5,000 per valuation, which can mean $4,000–$10,000+ in a year if a funding round triggers a second valuation.

Pricing is straightforward, at least until you need the finance-heavy stuff.

Startup: $1,200/year flat, up to 25 stakeholders. Cap table, SAFE issuance, fundraise modeling, concierge onboarding.

Growth: $3,500/year, up to 40 stakeholders. Adds 409A valuations, electronic exercises, board approvals, HRIS integration, Form 3921.

Angel investors writing cheques under $50,000 count as half a stakeholder.

Above 40 stakeholders: Enterprise, with no published figure. ASC 718, custom reporting, and managed equity administration all live there.

Here's the gap worth noticing. Vendr's brokered Pulley contracts show a median of $7,548/year, with most falling between $3,946 and $8,883. That's roughly double the published Growth price, which tells you where companies actually end up once stakeholder count grows past 40, even though the website stops at $3,500.

No published overage rate. Vendr records that exceeding a tier threshold triggers either overage charges or a forced tier upgrade, plus onboarding and migration fees of $500–$2,500 and bundled 409A at $1,500–$5,000 per valuation.

Pulley deserves credit for publishing more than Carta does. The limitation is that it publishes the part covering the first two years and goes quiet on the part covering the next five.

Reviews & ratings The larger review base, but also the lowest rating among the major platforms.
  • 4.3/5 across roughly 230 G2 reviews.
  • Scores 8.3/10 on being a good business partner versus a category average of 9.2.
  • Reviewers credit breadth, investor familiarity, and reliability.
  • Recurring criticism: rising costs, onboarding friction, support responsiveness around renewal, and difficulty getting data out.
Higher ratings, but from a smaller and much more early-stage-heavy group of users.
  • 4.7/5 across roughly 132 G2 reviews.
  • Founders specifically praise the scenario-modelling experience when stress-testing dilution before signing a term sheet.
  • About 87% of Pulley's G2 reviewers are small businesses. That's a strong signal for early-stage companies, but tells you less about how it performs at Series B.
  • The recurring limitation is scale: you may eventually need capabilities that sit behind an Enterprise conversation.

What the table adds up to

Look across the table and the same pattern keeps showing up. Carta’s strengths are mostly where Pulley has gaps, and Pulley’s strengths are where Carta falls short.

Carta gives you depth, institutional credibility, and a genuinely free way to get started. Pulley gives you something that’s easier to operate yourself as a founder and, more predictable pricing, and the same level of support whether you’re a first-time founder or a larger team.

But there’s another pattern worth paying attention to: both products get harder to navigate once you move past roughly 40 stakeholders.

That’s where the more finance-heavy requirements start showing up: ASC 718, custom reporting, and managed administration. On Carta, those capabilities sit in Scale. On Pulley, they sit in Enterprise.

And that creates an uncomfortable trade-off. The capabilities you may need for your first serious audit are also the capabilities you only get at the point where you have the least time to deal with a plan change and potentially the least leverage to negotiate it.

That’s probably the more useful question to take away from this comparison. Not “Which one is better today?” but “What happens when I cross that line?”

And more importantly "do you actually have to choose between a platform that’s deep and one that’s easy to run, or is there a point where you can get both?"

How Qapita stacks up

Qapita is an equity management platform built to handle the full equity lifecycle from your first SAFE and employee grant to 409A valuations, financial reporting, tender offers, and IPO preparation. The team behind it brings 20+ years of experience working with complex equity structures. 3,000+ companies globally trust Qapita to manage theirs.

Qapita is the "friendlier" alternative to both Carta & Pulley - more flexible, easier to use, offer better support and with pricing which is more affordable & transparent

Category Qapita
Starting off A free plan that's a real product, with a paid path you can see before you commit.
  • Qapita Spark is free for companies under 25 stakeholders and under $1M raised, a permanent tier, not a trial.
  • Includes cap table management, electronic issuance, individual stakeholder logins, equity plans, automatic SAFE tracking, funding round modelling, a data room, and DocuSign.
  • From Surge upward, white-glove migration is included, with the team handling discovery, data migration, validation, and go-live.
  • You own your share certificates, and your equity history exports cleanly.
  • At the entry level, it's roughly on par with Carta while removing Pulley's $1,200 barrier to getting started properly.
Features & functionality The breadth is there without making you unlock the platform module by module.
  • Live, version-controlled cap table across rounds, hires, SAFEs, secondaries, and conversions.
  • Stock plan administration across ESOPs, RSUs, PSUs, options, phantom stock, and SARs.
  • Scenario modelling for funding rounds, option pool expansions, and convertible note conversions.
  • 83(b) document generation, board consents, Form 3921, and Rule 701 support.
  • ASC 718 and IFRS reporting, plus ASC 820-compliant portfolio valuations.
  • Tender offers and structured liquidity programmes.
  • Multi-entity support lets companies operating across jurisdictions keep grants in one register rather than maintaining separate books and reconciling them every quarter.
409A valuations In-house, fast, and available even if you're not using Qapita for the rest of your equity management.
  • Included from the Growth plan at $3,000/year.
  • Five business day turnaround through an in-house valuation team.
  • Signed by real specialists (CFA) who can defend the methodology to your auditor.
  • Available as a standalone service, so the valuation isn't being used to keep you on the platform.
  • Audit-ready reporting ties back to the same grant record as the cap table.
Support One support model for everyone, and probably one of the clearest differentiators in the review data.
  • Onboarding and migration assistance are included from the $1,600 Surge plan upward.
  • Customer support is the most frequently mentioned strength in Qapita's G2 reviews.
  • Advisory support covers equity plan design, incentive structuring, and valuation, useful when you're a founder who doesn't necessarily know what questions to ask yet.
  • Founders migrating from Carta describe being guided through discovery, migration, validation, and go-live rather than simply being handed documentation.
Pricing The full pricing ladder is published, including what happens when another stakeholder joins. And this translated to great value – companies migrating from existing platforms realise significant savings.
  • Spark: Free up to 25 stakeholders and under $1M raised.
  • Surge: $1,600/year up to 40 stakeholders, then +$40 per additional stakeholder. Adds reporting, email support, and onboarding/migration assistance.
  • Growth: $3,000/year up to 50 stakeholders, then +$60 per additional stakeholder. Adds 409A valuation reports, board consents, 83(b), and Form 3921.
  • Enterprise: Custom pricing: adds GAAP/ASC 718 and IFRS reporting, custom administrator roles, SSO, and dedicated phone support.
  • The key difference is predictability: Qapita publishes the overage rate, so you have a clearer idea of what happens as your stakeholder count grows.
Reviews & ratings The highest customer satisfaction rating in the category, from the largest review base among challengers.
  • 4.6/5 across roughly 310–320 G2 reviews.
  • Ranked highest in customer satisfaction on the G2 Equity Management Grid in both Enterprise and Mid-Market.
  • Ahead of Carta on every listed G2 dimension: meets requirements 8.9 vs. 8.7, usability 9.1 vs. 8.6, and ease of setup 8.8 vs. 7.9.
  • Dashboard rated 90%, with reviewers describing it as usable without significant platform familiarity.
  • G2's summary of why reviewers choose Qapita over Carta and Pulley comes down to three things: user-friendly interface, strong customer support, and competitive pricing.

The idea is simple: you shouldn’t have to change platforms as your company gets more complicated. Your first SAFE, your first grant batch, your first audit, your first secondary all of it stays in the same system, with the same underlying record at Qapita. No migration when your equity history is at its most valuable and hardest to move.

That’s the difference Qapita is trying to create. Carta gives you depth, but its pricing gets harder to predict as you grow. Pulley gives you a simple operating model and published pricing, but that pricing stops being public beyond 40 stakeholders. Qapita starts free, publishes every tier, and even tells you what each additional stakeholder costs $40 on Surge and $60 on Growth.

And there’s a signal beyond the product and pricing. On the G2 Grid for Equity Management, Qapita holds all four badges: Best Usability, Best Relationship, Best Implementable, and Best Results. Best Usability is where Pulley tends to stand out. Best Results is where Carta tends to stand out. Qapita holding both is the point: the goal isn’t to choose between a platform that’s easy for a founder and one that’s deep enough for the finance team.

Trusted by Qapita customers

Two ways to start

FAQ:

What is the main difference between Carta and Pulley?

Depth versus transparency. Carta is the broader platform and the format most investors and law firms already recognise, but it publishes no pricing above its free tier. Pulley is easier for a founder to run alone and publishes its prices, but only up to 40 stakeholders. Both put ASC 718 reporting, custom reporting, and managed administration behind an unpublished top tier, Scale at Carta, Enterprise at Pulley. So the practical difference shows up at your first audit, not on your first day.

Is Carta better than Pulley?

Not universally. Carta is better if diligence credibility matters most and you'll use the wider module set. Pulley is better if a founder is running equity without a finance team and you want a price you can budget. Carta has a free tier; Pulley starts at $1,200/year. Pulley includes two 409A valuations at $3,500/year, which Carta doesn't match at that price. Pick based on who operates it and what your next milestone is.

Why do startups look for alternatives to Carta and Pulley?

Cost and tier gates, mostly. Carta buyers cite unpredictable renewals, brokered contracts run from about $2,900 to $55,000 a year, with a median near $15,400, plus per-stakeholder overages and 5–10% annual escalators. Pulley users hit a ceiling at 40 stakeholders, where the published pricing stops and ASC 718 moves to Enterprise. In both cases the capability needed at a milestone sits one tier above the plan you're on, and you negotiate for it mid-round or mid-audit.

What are the alternatives to Carta and Pulley?

Qapita, Shareworks, Astrella, Ledgy, Cake Equity, and Eqvista are the ones most commonly evaluated. Which fits depends on where you're headed. If you're staying US-only with a simple cap table, the lighter tools work. If you'll need 409A valuations, ASC 718 reporting, phantom stock or SARs, or entities in more than one country, you need a platform with that depth already in it rather than sold as an upgrade later.

How should startups choose between Carta, Pulley, and Qapita?

Ask three questions. What ends my current plan? Headcount, a funding round, or both? What does an additional stakeholder cost? Which of the things I'll need in two years sits in a different tier today? Carta's free tier ends at 25 stakeholders or $1M raised. Pulley publishes prices to 40 stakeholders. Qapita publishes every tier plus per-stakeholder costs ($40 on Surge, $60 on Growth). The answers tell you how many times you're buying.

Is Qapita a good alternative for companies comparing Carta vs Pulley?

Yes, particularly between seed and Series B. Qapita has a free plan like Carta, publishes pricing like Pulley, and keeps publishing past the point where both stop, including per-stakeholder costs. Cap table, stock plans, 409A valuations, scenario modelling, financial reporting, tender offers, and IPO preparation run on one platform, so seed to IPO doesn't require a re-platform. It's the only equity platform holding all four G2 badges: Best Usability, Best Relationship, Best Implementable, and Best Results.

Which platform is best for managing a growing cap table?

The one whose depth is already in the plan you're on. Growth is what breaks a cap table platform, more stakeholders, more instrument types, an audit calendar, and eventually a secondary. Carta and Pulley both handle that well but move the relevant capability into a higher, unpublished tier. Qapita includes 409A from $3,000/year for 50 stakeholders and publishes what each stakeholder beyond that costs, so you can price your third year before signing for your first.

About Author

Team Qapita
Try Qapita today!
Elevate your equity management with smarter solutions for growth and compliance.

Stay connected with exclusive updates!

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.