Nov 25, 2021
Types of Funding Rounds: Seed, Series A, B, C...
How various funding rounds work, and what are the similarities and differences between them?
Do you know how early investors protect their stake in a company when new funding rounds occur? This scenario highlights the importance of understanding anti-dilution provisions. These clauses are designed to safeguard investors from the dilution of their equity stake when new shares are issued at a lower valuation. But how exactly do anti-dilution provisions work, and what types are available?
In this article, we'll explore anti-dilution provisions, their definitions, types, importance, limitations, and how they protect investors.
An anti-dilution provision is a clause in investment agreements that protects early investors from losing the value of their equity when a company issues new shares at a lesser price than what they originally paid. This scenario, known as a "down round," can significantly impact investors, reducing both the value and percentage of their ownership in a company.
In simpler terms, if you invested in a company at a higher valuation and the company later raises money at a lower valuation, an anti-dilution provision helps preserve your ownership percentage or economic value by adjusting your conversion rights.
These provisions are particularly common in venture capital and private equity investments, where multiple funding rounds at different valuations are expected throughout a company's growth journey.
There are two primary types of anti-dilution provisions: Full Ratchet and Weighted Average. Each method calculates the adjusted conversion price differently, offering varying levels of protection to investors.
A full-ratchet provision offers the most comprehensive protection for investors. It adjusts the conversion price of the investor's securities to the new, lower price at which new shares are issued. This means that if new shares are issued at a price that is 50% lower than the original price, the investor's conversion price would also decrease by 50%, effectively maintaining their ownership percentage.
For example, if an investor initially purchased shares at 10 per share and the company later issues new shares at 5 per share, a full-ratchet provision would adjust the investor's conversion price to 5. This adjustment allows the investor to convert their securities into twice as many shares as before, thereby offsetting the dilution caused by the new issuance.
Weighted average anti-dilution is more balanced and considers both the price and the number of shares involved in the down round. Instead of adjusting the conversion price to match the new issue price directly, it calculates a weighted average price that considers both the number of old and new shares and their respective prices.
The formula is:
New Conversion Price = Original Conversion Price × [(A + B) ÷ (A + C)]
Where:
A = Common stock outstanding before the new issuance
B = What the new shares would cost if purchased at the original conversion price
C = Actual proceeds from the new issuance
Here are some key important points to know about anti-dilution provisions:
1. Protects Investors: Ensures early investors don’t see their ownership diluted when new shares are issued at a lower price.
2. Encourages Investment and Capital Attraction: These provisions make investments more attractive by reducing downside risk, helping companies secure necessary funding.
3. Maintains Fair Valuations: Prevents drastic value erosion for existing stakeholders, balancing investor and founder interests.
4. Accountability: The provisions incentivize founders to maintain or increase the company's valuation in subsequent funding rounds.
5. Market Standard: They've become standard in venture financing, and investors often expect them as part of any term sheet.
While anti-dilution provisions offer significant protection, they also have limitations:
1. Founder Dilution: They can disproportionately dilute founders and employees, potentially affecting motivation and retention.
2. Complexity: Particularly with weighted average provisions, calculations can become complex with multiple rounds of financing.
3. Potential for Conflict: These provisions may cause disagreements between new and existing investors.
4. Potential for Over-Protection: Overly protective provisions might deter future investors who are concerned about the potential for significant adjustments in ownership percentages.
5. Impact on Future Fundraising: Startups with aggressive anti-dilution clauses may struggle to attract new investors.
When negotiating these provisions, several factors should be considered:
1. Type of Provision: Full ratchet is highly protective but heavily dilutive, while weighted average is more balanced.
2. Investor Priorities: Investors should prioritize maintaining their ownership percentage, while companies should consider the potential effects on future fundraising efforts.
3. Fairness to All Stakeholders: Striking a balance between investor protection and company growth is essential.
4. Long-Term Impact: Overly aggressive anti-dilution clauses can discourage future investors.
5. Pay-to-Play Requirements: Decide whether investors must participate in future rounds to maintain their anti-dilution protection.
6. Broad-Based vs. Narrow-Based: For weighted average provisions, determine whether to use a broad-based formula (including options and warrants) or narrow-based (considering only outstanding shares).
7. Consider whether the provisions should expire after certain milestones or time periods.
Anti-dilution provisions are a critical component of investment agreements, ensuring that investors are protected from equity dilution in the event of a down round. While full ratchet provisions offer the highest level of protection, they can be detrimental to founders. Weighted average provisions, on the other hand, provide a more balanced approach.
For investors seeking protection or founders navigating term sheets, understanding the mechanics and implications of these provisions is essential for successful negotiation and long-term company growth. The right approach to anti-dilution can help align incentives between investors and founders, creating a foundation for sustainable growth even when facing fundraising challenges.
